Free Cash Flow vs EBITDA
Gordon Growth wants free cash flow in the numerator, not EBITDA. The exit multiple method wants EBITDA. Mixing them up silently overstates terminal value by the amount of capex plus working-capital investment the business needs to keep growing.
The bridge from EBITDA to FCFF
Each subtraction matters. Cash taxes on EBIT (not on net income) reflect that interest is not a deductible step at the firm-level. Capex includes maintenance plus growth capex. Working-capital increase ties up cash that is not available to capital providers.
The capital-intensive trap
Capex modest, working capital sometimes negative (deferred revenue). EBITDA and FCFF run close. Substituting EBITDA into Gordon Growth introduces a smaller error.
Capex can equal half of EBITDA. Substituting EBITDA into Gordon Growth overstates terminal value materially. Use FCFF explicitly.